Pew pew pew pew: dakka dakka dakka dakka! Feb 8 Comment | Older

The insignificance of Twitter

Monday, February 9, 2009

Almost a hundred people are dead and thousands are homeless from the Victorian bushfires as I write this. It is a horrible tragedy and I am thinking good thoughts for everyone.


Meanwhile:

jjprojects: Wondering why @KevinRuddPM isn't offering twitter updates during this national crisis? Twitter person doesn't work on weekends? #bushfires

Wow. Really?

Sure, Twitter is great, but let’s be serious. It is quite a lot more important for Kevin Rudd and his team to actually go to Victoria and do something about it and talk to the mainstream media, all of which I imagine is extremely time-consuming. So maybe we should give the dude a break.

Bronwen: I'll say it - @jjprojects given the tragedy wondering about the PM's twittering seems a little introverted and not helpful.

Quite.


This kind of illustrates something I’ve been learning about this week.

I think it’s fair to say I live in a bit of an echo chamber as regards being well-connected on the Internet. I’ve made the Internet a big part of my life for some years now, and it’s a major part of what pays my wage every month. In fact, I even suggested earlier in the week in a conversation that perhaps most of the visitors to our website (very web focused) already knew about Twitter, to which I received a resounding “hell no way dude.” Needless to say I have been doing quite a bit more research!

So, of course I’m probably prone to overestimate the impact of something like Twitter on the rest of the world. I think I probably don’t overestimate its impact on the real world (as evidenced above), and I don’t tend to believe in its place in the market as much as some people, but the fact that Twitter generally is really quite tiny was quite the eye opener for me.

Let’s take a look, using the above sentiment about this disaster as an example.

  1. According to Tweetrush, about 424,592 people worldwide were tweeting on Twitter on Saturday.1
  2. By comparison, Victoria’s population alone is roughly 12 times that number—almost 5.3 million people.
  3. According to OzTAM an estimated 569,000 people watched Channel Seven’s news on Saturday night in Melbourne, 509,000 watched Channel Nine’s, 486,000 watched Channel Ten’s, and 445,000 watched ABC’s.2

That is: There were more people watching one TV channel’s 30-minute TV programme in Melbourne than were using Twitter worldwide all day.

Given limited time and a fairly big disaster to deal with, if you were the Prime Minister, would you direct your media attention to Twitter?


1 Tweetrush’s stats don’t include private tweeters. Additionally, it’s quite difficult to estimate how many of those people are Australians, since country statistics usually depend on either the profile being filled in correctly (unreliable) or on web traffic measurement (also poor, as it doesn’t measure API clients or SMS).

2 The real source of these numbers is OzTAM, but their nightly numbers are a subscription service.

4 Comments ( feed)

  1. https://me.yahoo.com/a/E64tf5Bg2M52gYqJY7KJyr.XYn0yQw--
    Posted February 9, 2009 at 11:42 AM | Permalink | Reply
    I agree with you about Twitter being quite small, although many journalists now use it as a soure of near real-time info.

    This is not the only thing I twittered about the bushfires, it was just one small observation :(

    Great to see that the PM's twitter steam is now giving some very useful info, like this:

    ACCESSING EMERGENCY GOVERNMENT ASSISTANCE: Contact Centrelink http://cli.gs/7bXgjQ #KevinPM Team #Bushfires

    and this:

    Victorian Bushfire Information Line - call 1800 240 667. Official Govt info and updates http://cli.gs/3SjSHJ #KevinPM Team #Bushfires

    That's the kind of stuff I meant.

    And yes, you're a right, the dude does deserve a break - tough times for everyone involved. I saw him nearly break down with emotion on tv news this morning. Awful, awful tragedy.

    JJ
  2. Posted February 9, 2009 at 12:11 PM | Permalink | Reply
    Yeah, it's not just what you wrote. But it's like when the Mumbai thing happened; it was exceedingly distasteful to see a bunch of people crowing about how Twitter pwned the mainstream media blah blah blah, while people were being blown up. And the best information was still coming from the media. (Note best, not freshest or most volume) It's worth more discussion later, not now.
  3. https://login.launchpad.net/+id/MfRPmem
    Posted February 9, 2009 at 5:30 PM | Permalink | Reply
    You speak truth to power in this. Are you okay with getting an "amen"? Could I have you lecture the lovely librarians I encounter who are termed "twopointopians"?
  4. DrCris
    Posted February 24, 2009 at 5:35 PM | Permalink | Reply
    This is a fantastic article. I have to keep reminding myself that the online world is such a skewed and tiny population. And a bit incestuous when it comes to information. Classic tweet about KRudd, though. Would ahve made my favourites, too. Like "I am doing x, so why aren't all the important people also doing it."